Get Started With AI ETFs

Each replay uses a recreated ChatGPT interface so the placement can be read in its original conversational context. It is not a live or embedded chat.

1. ObservedJul 12, 2026Conversation3 turnsPlacementAfter turn 13 turns · After turn 1Replay chat
   Observed conversationJul 12, 2026 · interface recreation

   ChatGPTArchived view

   IPO window opening again. How do you evaluate new listings — lockup expiration risks, S-1 red flags, or post-IPO performance patterns? Any interesting ones on your radar?

   I generally evaluate IPOs by separating the business from the stock. A great company can still be a poor investment if it's priced too aggressively or if the market dynamics create selling pressure.

   Here's the framework I'd use.

   1. Start with the S-1: What is the company really telling you?

   The registration statement is often more informative than the marketing around the IPO.

   Things I pay close attention to include:

   • Revenue growth: Is growth accelerating or slowing?
   • Gross margins: High and improving margins often indicate pricing power.
   • Customer concentration: If a handful of customers generate a large share of revenue, that's a meaningful risk.
   • Retention metrics: Net revenue retention above 100% is a positive sign for many software businesses.
   • Cash flow: Free cash flow is often more revealing than adjusted EBITDA.
   • Share structure: Multiple voting classes can reduce shareholder influence.
   • Stock-based compensation: Excessive dilution deserves scrutiny.
   • Use of proceeds: Is the company raising capital for growth, or simply providing liquidity to existing investors?

   ---

   2. Lockup expiration is a real event

   Most insiders are prohibited from selling immediately after the IPO.

   Common lockup periods are around 180 days, although they can vary.

   The risk isn't that insiders sell because they lack confidence—it may simply be the first opportunity many employees and early investors have had to diversify.

   I usually look at:

   • How many shares become eligible for sale?
   • What percentage of the total float does that represent?
   • Are venture funds nearing the end of their fund life?
   • Is insider ownership still very high?

   A large increase in tradable shares can create temporary downward pressure even if the business is performing well.

   ---

   3. Watch valuation, not just quality

   Outstanding businesses sometimes debut at valuations that assume years of perfect execution.

   Questions I ask include:

   • Enterprise value to sales relative to peers
   • Growth-adjusted valuation
   • Gross margin profile
   • Profitability timeline
   • Market size assumptions

   Sometimes the better investment is waiting six to twelve months after the IPO if expectations cool.

   ---

   4. Post-IPO patterns I often see

   There isn't a reliable pattern that every IPO follows, but historically several tendencies show up:

   • Strong first-day "pop" doesn't necessarily predict long-term outperformance.
   • Many IPOs experience elevated volatility during their first few months.
   • Quarterly earnings reports often matter more than the IPO itself because investors finally see how the company performs as a public business.
   • Lockup expirations can increase volatility, though the impact varies.
   • Companies with durable earnings growth tend to be driven by fundamentals over time rather than IPO-day enthusiasm.

   ---

   5. Red flags in an S-1

   Some issues that merit closer examination include:

   • Revenue growth slowing sharply before the IPO.
   • Heavy reliance on non-recurring or one-time revenue.
   • Large losses with no credible path toward improving unit economics.
   • Rising customer acquisition costs without corresponding gains in lifetime value.
   • Frequent changes in key operating metrics.
   • Extensive related-party transactions.
   • Legal or regulatory risks that could materially affect the business.
   • Aggressive adjustments to present "adjusted" profitability.

   One red flag alone doesn't necessarily rule out an investment, but several together warrant caution.

   ---

   6. Catalysts after the IPO

   After a company lists, I pay attention to:

   • First and second earnings reports
   • Insider selling after lockups expire
   • Analyst estimate revisions
   • Guidance changes
   • New product launches
   • Customer wins or losses
   • Macroeconomic conditions affecting the sector

   The first year often provides a much clearer picture than the IPO roadshow.

   What's on my radar?

   Rather than focusing on a specific upcoming IPO without current market data, I'd group areas of interest by themes:

   • AI infrastructure (semiconductors, networking, data-center software)
   • Cybersecurity
   • Defense technology
   • Financial infrastructure and payments
   • Developer tools
   • Industrial automation and robotics
   • Healthcare technology with recurring revenue and strong reimbursement dynamics

   For companies in these areas, I'd look for recurring revenue, expanding margins, reasonable customer concentration, and evidence that growth isn't being driven solely by short-term AI enthusiasm.

   If you're thinking about participating in a specific IPO, I can also help analyze its S-1, estimate dilution and lockup risk, compare its valuation to public peers, and discuss how its fundamentals stack up.

   

   FFidelity InvestmentsAd

   Track Market ActivityReal-Time Insights for Your Stocks, ETFs, and Options.

   Quality business with reasonable valuation and strong sponsors.

   That's generally the sweet spot. I usually want to see all three align:

   1. Quality business

      • Durable competitive advantage
      • Large addressable market
      • Consistent execution
      • Healthy unit economics
      • High returns on invested capital or a credible path toward them

   2. Reasonable valuation

      • Not necessarily "cheap," but one that doesn't require flawless execution to justify the price.
      • I'd rather buy a company at 10–15× forward sales growing 40% with improving margins than 30× sales on the same fundamentals.
      • For traditional businesses, I'd compare EV/EBITDA, P/E, and free cash flow yield against comparable public companies.

   3. Strong sponsors

      • Reputable long-term investors often improve governance and board quality.
      • I look at who is remaining invested after the IPO, not just who backed the company initially.
      • Large retained stakes by founders and high-quality institutional sponsors can be encouraging, although they're not guarantees of future performance.

   One nuance I think is underappreciated is the distinction between an offer for sale (OFS) and a primary issuance. If nearly all the IPO proceeds are existing shareholders cashing out, I ask why they're selling now. In contrast, if a meaningful portion of the proceeds goes into the business to fund growth, that can be a more attractive setup—provided the capital is likely to earn good returns. Reuters recently noted, for example, that the planned IPO of SBI Funds Management is structured entirely as an OFS, meaning the company itself will not receive new capital from the offering.

   If I had to rank factors by importance, it'd be:

   1. Business quality (50%)
   2. Valuation (30%)
   3. Management and sponsors (20%)

   A mediocre company rarely becomes a great investment just because it's inexpensive, and a great company can disappoint if the IPO valuation already reflects years of exceptional future performance.

   One principle that's served many long-term investors well is to be willing to wait. The first earnings reports, the end of the lockup period, and the market's initial excitement often provide better information and, in some cases, more attractive entry points than buying on day one. That isn't a universal rule—some IPOs perform well immediately—but patience can improve the balance between risk and reward.

   

   iShares® by BlackRockAd

   Get Started With AI ETFsAccess ETFs That Offer AI Exposure.

   Current IPO market vs 2020-2021 frenzy?

   The current IPO market feels much healthier than the 2020–2021 cycle, even if it's less exciting.

   Here's how I'd compare them:

   2020–2021	Current market
   Abundant liquidity and near-zero interest rates	Higher cost of capital means investors are more selective
   Revenue growth often mattered more than profitability	Investors expect clearer paths to cash flow and earnings
   Large first-day pops were common	Pricing is generally more disciplined, with fewer outsized debuts
   SPACs and speculative listings proliferated	Higher-quality companies dominate the pipeline
   Almost any "growth story" could attract demand	Institutional investors are rewarding execution and durable fundamentals

   The biggest difference is who has the bargaining power.

   In 2021, issuers largely dictated terms. Companies could often command premium valuations despite limited operating histories or persistent losses.

   Today, institutional investors have more leverage. Bookrunners typically need to price deals so that long-term investors can see a reasonable prospective return, rather than maximizing the IPO price at all costs. That has contributed to a reopening of the market, but one focused on companies with stronger fundamentals rather than broad-based speculation.

   Another notable change is quality over quantity. While IPO issuance has recovered from the slowdown of 2022–2024, the market is still far more selective than during the peak years. Recent commentary points out that only a relatively narrow group of companies—typically larger, later-stage businesses with established financial profiles—has been able to come public successfully.

   From an investor's perspective, I actually prefer today's environment because it tends to reward the attributes you mentioned earlier:

   • High-quality businesses
   • Reasonable valuations
   • Strong sponsors
   • Sustainable growth
   • Improving profitability

   That doesn't eliminate risk—IPO valuations can still be ambitious—but it shifts the focus from momentum to fundamentals.

   One practical implication is that the first earnings report after the IPO matters more now. During the 2020–2021 period, strong market sentiment often overshadowed fundamentals for a while. In today's market, companies are expected to validate their investment case quickly through execution.

   If the current IPO window remains open, sectors I'd expect to continue drawing interest include AI infrastructure, enterprise software, cybersecurity, financial infrastructure, industrial technology, and defense-related businesses—provided they're profitable or have a credible path to profitability. Investors have generally shown more willingness to pay premium multiples in those areas when the underlying business quality supports it.

   

   AAlphaSense Inc.Ad

   AlphaSense Market IntelligenceEvery critical data source on a single, powerful platform. Get started for free.

   

   RRobinhoodAd

   Let your AI agent tradeMarket access for AI agents w/ Robinhood